People-centered Design

THE HAZARDS OF USER DATA AND FEEDBACK …

It seems almost sacrilegious to say it, but I think it is really important to maintain significant caution around data obtained from user feedback, testing or group discussions. Too often I hear people proudly say that all their design decisions are based on feedback from users, or one hears leadership asking that all the design decisions be based on documented data from user feedback.

These attitudes are, of course, well-founded, but at the same time they are seriously misguided – and for a number of different reasons …

WHO DID YOU GET FEEDBACK FROM?

Frequently the data and feedback has come from today’s users, or from preferred customers and rarely has it come from the users that the product is intended for, or where the commercial imperative is coming from.

HOW MANY PEOPLE DID YOU GET FEEDBACK FROM?

Frequently the data and feedback that is informing design decisions this month comes from the user feedback obtained this month, which may well have involved only a small fraction of the users being consulted across the whole development lifecycle.

Of course, this month’s feedback may be the only feedback directly addressing a particular feature or user need – but that still leaves one basing decisions on a very small amount of input

HOW DIFFERENT (OR CHALLENGING) IS YOUR DESIGN VISION?

Is the vision for the experience with this new release or product rooted in today’s workflows, habits and activities, or are you trying to bring about some innovation in the way tasks are done and reasoned about? If the latter, then user feedback is always liable to pull you back into the non-innovative frame of mind

The importance of empathy

Who needs to understand who? But with whom? Most work focuses on our empathy with our customers or users, but it may often be the case that we need empathy with our colleagues even more.

A map of whose journey?

Journey maps, experience roadmaps, customer experience journeys are all common tools nowadays, but a key question that needs to be asked is "whose journey are we mapping?" and is that the right person?

The compelling touchscreen – who benefits?

Touchscreens and touch interfaces are all the rage – but is this a people-centred movement? Arguably the strongest push for the use of touchscreens is the updatability of them – with a firmware update the UI can be changed significantly. But there are also strong marketing pressures as it is a common belief that touchscreens make a product feel more modern and innovative. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the car, where touchscreens increasingly dominate despite very good reasons to doubt their value to the driver.

Usability considered harmful …?

Not necessarily the same as gathering input from users, ‘usability’ often implies a rigorous testing of a product or interface (in A-B testing or similar). But such rigorous, data-driven processes can arguably be quite detrimental to successful product or service design.

Maps are Selective

Journey maps, user mapping, and many other methods all aim to produce a map of some facet of the user experience. In this context it is useful to reflect on the fact that 2D representations of a 3D world are always inaccurate – even while being phenomenally useful.

UX strategy or Design Strategy?

Brand strategy and design strategy seem to be well understood terms, but the idea of an experience strategy seems to be a step too far for many (is it not just the same as one these other two?).

Interviewing Users

Harmony Design Culture

UE Boom design awards

Writing a good conversation guide

UE Roll unexpected usage

Delivering radiation therapy